Why Is Everybody So Quiet About the CPU?

Westchester Playa Community Plan Update February 2024

A poster on Nextdoor recently asked about status for our Community Plan Update (“CPU”), and the comments surprised me. I saw a deep misunderstanding in our community about housing policy in this state and what is facing us here in LA and more specifically, Westchester/Playa.

I’m not really surprised about the widespread misunderstanding. We’re being pelted from so many directions, you practically have to be a scholar on housing policy to understand the nuances. While I’m no scholar, I have been closely following the issues for almost a decade and I belong to several housing groups where these topics are regularly discussed. Here are my cliff notes to help bring you up to speed on the different issues, along with my latest information on the next round of CPU draft changes.

From the highest level the state’s housing authority runs a housing assessment cycle called the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (“RHNA”). Every six years they dictate the number of units we need to build in CA to house our citizens. We are currently in a cycle that runs from 2021 to 2029.

Unfortunately, the ultra progressive factions are having a moment and pushing through a housing agenda with a lot of unrealistic and downright stupid housing policy (trickle down from the left, anybody??). They pushed through SB-9 which pretty much does away with single family zoning and local control as a matter of state law. It’s a problem, and comes during a time when California is losing population, especially losing our more affluent population, the people who pay for government giveaways favored by the factions currently in power. I wrote more about these laws last year here.

For more about SB-9, read Lots Of Housing Laws, Not Much Housing. See also, New Laws Seek To End Private Developer Risk, Burdening Public Instead.

But SB-9 and the other state laws are a completely different issue than what we’re currently experiencing with our CPU. The CPU is about zoning changes and quotas. And these quotas come from one agency, California’s Housing & Community Development (or “HCD”). I wrote this summer about the alarming quotas in the current cycle here.

LA’s staggering quota and its response to our assigned quota is to rezone wide swaths of our city. Some of that rezoning is being done with a rewrite of the city’s Housing Element. A lot of it is being done with Community Plan Updates (CPUs).

The city will tell you they have to comply with the quota, or the consequences from the state are draconian. I agree the consequences are ridiculously draconian, but instead of rolling over and rezoning, I’d like to see some critical pushback by the city on the numbers, especially in light of our declining population. This mindless rezoning could result in devastation to our mature single-family home communities before most people wake up to the idiocy of the strategy.

Our CPU in Westchester/Playa started well before the pandemic and has been going on for awhile. My first hint we might be in trouble was when they announced the entire westside (south of Santa Monica) would undergo concurrent CPUs. That is unheard of, and my current understanding based on wide reading and conversations with various city officials and other pundits is that this method was chosen to dump tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of units on the westside, with maximum flexibility on where they dump the units. For years, people from other parts of the city complained the westside wasn’t doing its part to house our citizens.

It bears pointing out that Pacific Palisades and Brentwood are also considered the “westside” and they are not part of this exercise. They will get new CPUs at some point, but this crazy allocation dump will likely be over by then.

NOTE: We’re not talking about built units when talking about the CPUs and rezoning, we’re talking only about rezoning, which in my mind is worse. The city plans to rezone many multiples of the needed number “in hopes” the needed number gets built. So instead of focusing new development in a concentrate area (like Playa Vista when it was built) where infrastructure can be built to support the new units. we’re all at risk of random “middle fingers” popping up next to our home blocking our sun and sucking up our parking and sewer system.

Also important to note, HCD and our state legislators don’t care about the crumbling infrastructure. That’s their idea of “local control” – they dictate stupid numbers and we figure out the consequences locally. There is going to be a nasty day of reckoning with failed infrastructure that nobody at the city level is talking about.

The first draft of our CPU (pre-pandemic) was an affair with tons of public outreach and opportunities to have a say, or at least be heard. Then came the pandemic. The CPUs slowed down but the public meetings stopped. Last summer (post-pandemic), city planners dropped the 2nd draft of the westside CPUs. They didn’t drop them for the public. They dropped them to a hand-picked “advisory” group. And while they were published on a public website, they were not announced (“if a tree falls in the forest…”).

Quite by accident, some of our community members “discovered” the draft maps and the bombshells in that draft. Almost all of Osage and a huge quadrant around Manchester/Sepulveda were mapped for six units on a lot. 😱 There is no way our crumbling infrastructure can handle a fraction of the development allowed on those lots, let alone the additional traffic on our arterials which already serve as the “gateway to LAX.” Our community was incensed, first by the density, and more importantly, by the sudden covert nature of the process. We were in an uproar.

We attended community meetings in huge numbers, we protested, we signed petitions, we brought out the media, we galvanized our new council person. We hosted the planners for a tour of our community and were shocked how little they understood about the implications of their “plan.” All of this was happening in summer into fall 2023. The planners promised to rewrite their plan and now we’re waiting for that draft. Back channels have indicated we’ll see big changes, but we just won’t know for sure until those plans are published.

We were first told to expect the new draft in December. My sources are now telling me early to mid-March. As a prominent voice in this fight, I personally apologize for going dark over the holidays, but man, the fight was exhausting. I (and many others in our community) put so much time and energy into Concerned For Westchester and other allied groups. Once we went into a lull, it was hard for awhile to think about these big issues.

Stay tuned. We’ll know soon whether we need to fight on for a CPU we can live with, but I’m also here to tell you we haven’t even started considering the Housing Element and the proposed changes to that. There may be another fight brewing, but on a citywide basis. That’s good for a bigger conversation, but it’s harder to impact that bigger conversation, also. Proponents for the current housing agenda are incredibly organized and play the social media game at a high level. They also have a lot of developer money behind them. Every one of us needs to be aware of these issues and helping educate our friends, family and neighbors. The changes are coming fast and furious and many of the changes rolling over us are nonsensical.

For my own part, I will continue to beat the drum to make people aware of what is going on, so they can vote accordingly and fight back as needed. I hope soon to see the political tide come back to the middle, but it’s going to take a lot of political change at both the state and city level. I have been heartened to see that Mayor Bass appears sensitive to public pushback. She agreed to take single-family zones out of her ED-1. That means, at least at the city level, we still have a chance.

And before the haters hate on me, let me say I am a mother with a young adult child in Los Angeles. I am fully aware what a challenge and privilege it is to be housed in LA. I stand 100% as a realtor, mother and community member for affordable housing options in LA. My beef is with destroying mature R-1 neighborhoods on a whim when there is still so much room to grow in areas that were designed to accommodate more density. Oh, and I’m also 110% against the fictitious numbers that say LA needs to increase its housing stock by 35% in a time when so many are leaving our state.


Tracy is active in a number of local community organizations including the Neighborhood Council PLUC, Neighborhood Council Ad Hoc CPU Committee, Kentwood Home Guardians and Emerson Ave Community Garden Club. The views expressed in this post are Tracy’s alone, and should not be construed in any way as an opinion of any other group. Are you planning a meeting with the planners? Have Tracy along to make sure you get the same information other community members get. Are you willing to host a group of your neighbors for a talk? Tracy would be happy to join you.


About Tracy Thrower Conyers Tracy Thrower Conyers is a long-time resident of Westchester 90045. Tracy closely follows local politics, political players and social chatter relevant to Westchester. You’ll frequently find her at Neighborhood Council meetings, as well as on all the social platforms where 90045 peeps hang out. Tracy is a real estate broker and founding principal in Silicon Beach Properties. She is a recognized expert on Silicon Beach and its impact on residential and residential income real estate, and has been featured by respected media outlets including the LA Times, KPCC and KCET. Tracy is also a licensed attorney and accidental housing policy junkie.

The Ultimate Contact List For Our Los Angeles Mayor & City Council Members

Contact the mayor. Contact our city council members. Staff directories available.

Karen Bass, Mayor

mayor.helpdesk@lacity.org
213.978.0600
Staff Directory
https://twitter.com/MayorOfLA
https://www.facebook.com/MayorOfLA
https://instagram.com/mayorofla

Eunisses Hernandez, CD1

Councilmember.Hernandez@lacity.org
Chelsea Lucktenberg, Communications Director — chelsea.lucktenberg@lacity.org
field office phone – (323) 709-1800
city hall office phone – (213) 473-7001
Staff Directory
https://twitter.com/EunissesH
https://www.facebook.com/cd1losangeles
https://instagram.com/cd1losangeles

Adrin Nazarian, CD2

adrin.nazarian@lacity.org
field office phone – (818) 755-7676
city hall office phone – (213) 473-7002
(additional information not available at time of publication)

Bob Blumenfield, CD3

Councilmember.Blumenfield@lacity.org
city hall office phone – (213) 473-7003
field office phone – (818) 774-4330
Staff Directory
https://twitter.com/BobBlumenfield
https://www.facebook.com/BobBlumenfieldSFV
https://instagram.com/bobblumenfield

Nithya Raman, CD4

contactCD4@lacity.org
Stella Stahl, Communications Director — stella.stahl@lacity.org
city hall office phone – (213) 473-7004
field office phone – 323.957.6415 & 818.728.9924
Staff Directory
https://twitter.com/cd4losangeles & https://twitter.com/nithyavraman
https://www.facebook.com/cd4losangeles
https://instagram.com/cd4losangeles

Katy Yaroslavsky, CD5

councilmember.yaroslavsky@lacity.org
Leo Daube, Communications Director — leo.daube@lacity.org
city hall office phone – (213) 473-7005
field office phone – 323.866.1828
Staff Directory
https://twitter.com/cd5losangeles
https://www.facebook.com/CD5LosAngeles
https://instagram.com/cd5losangeles

Imelda Padilla, CD6

councilmember.padilla@lacity.org
city hall office phone – (213) 473-7006
field office phone – 818.778.4999 & 818.771.0236
Staff Directory
https://twitter.com/cd6losangeles
https://www.facebook.com/CD6LosAngeles
https://instagram.com/cd6losangeles

Monica Rodriguez, CD7

councilmember.rodriguez@lacity.org
Vanessa Diaz, Communications Director — vanessa.diaz@lacity.org
city hall office phone – (213) 473-7007
field office phone – (818) 756-8409 & (818) 485-0600 & (818) 352-3287
Staff Directory
https://twitter.com/MRodCD7
https://www.facebook.com/MonicaRodriguezCD7
https://instagram.com/mrodcd7

Marqueece Harris-Dawson, CD8

councilmember.harris-dawson@lacity.org
Rhonda Mitchell, Communications Director — rhonda.mitchell@lacity.org
city hall office phone – (213) 473-7008
field office phone – 213.485.7616
Staff Directory
https://twitter.com/mhdcd8
https://www.facebook.com/mhdcd8
https://instagram.com/mhdcd8

Curren Price, CD9

councilmember.price@lacity.org
city hall office phone – (213) 473-7009
field office phone – 323.846.2651
Staff Directory
https://twitter.com/CurrenDPriceJr
https://www.facebook.com/CurrenDPriceJr/
https://instagram.com/currendpricejr

Heather Hutt, CD10

cd10@lacity.org
Devyn Bakewell, Communications Director — devyn.bakewell@lacity.org
city hall office phone – (213) 473-7010
field office phone – 323 733-8233 & 323 276-4917
Staff Directory
https://twitter.com/CW_HeatherHutt
https://www.facebook.com/CD10Updates
https://instagram.com/CW_Heather.Hutt

Traci Park, CD11

councilmember.park@lacity.org
Jonathan Davila, Communications Deputy — jonathan.davila@lacity.org
city hall office phone – (213) 473-7011
field office phone – 310.568.8772 & 310.575.8461
Staff Directory
https://www.facebook.com/councilwomantracipark
https://instagram.com/councilwomantracipark

John Lee, CD12

Councilmember.Lee@lacity.org
city hall office phone – (213) 473-7012
field office phone – 818.882.1212
Staff Directory
https://twitter.com/cd12la
https://www.facebook.com/CouncilmemberJohnLee
https://instagram.com/councilmemberjohnlee

Hugo Soto-Marinez, CD13

councilmember.soto-martinez@lacity.org
Nick Barnes-Batista, Senior Communications Deputy nick.barnesbatista@lacity.org
city hall office phone – (213) 473-7013
field office phone – 213.207.3015
Staff Directory
https://twitter.com/CD13LosAngeles
https://www.facebook.com/CD13LosAngeles
https://instagram.com/cd13losangeles

Ysabel Jurado, CD14

(not available at time of publication)
city hall office phone – (213) 473-7014
field office phone – 323-526-9332 & 323-226-1646 & 323-254-5295 & 323-226-1646

Tim McOsker, CD15

councilmember.mcosker@lacity.org
Sophie Gilchrist, Communications Director — sophie.gilchrist@lacity.org
city hall office phone – (213) 473-7015
field office phone – 310 732-4515 & 310 233-7201 & 323 568 2083
Staff Directory
https://twitter.com/timmcoskerla
https://www.facebook.com/TimMcOskerLA
https://instagram.com/timmcoskerla

Traci Park Explains Her Recent Housing Motion

Traci Park Addresses Westchester Playa Neighborhood Council

Traci turned up at last week’s Neighborhood Council meeting to give a personal Government Affairs update from her office. During her remarks she came out strong on her commitment to support us in defining our own community in connection with our Community Plan Update (CPU).

She also explained the misinformation being circulated about her recent motion to the City Council asking for a letter regarding SB 423, exempting coastal zone and extreme fire hazard communities from that state law. As you’ll hear in the video, that motion has nothing to do with housing unit allocations like we’re discussing with our CPU.

The audio sucks, but I know how to find video transcripts on youtube. 😎 Please understand that this transcript is computer-generated and probably hasn’t been corrected by her team.

Traci’s remarks specifically about her motion start around the 5 minute mark, but the whole video is worth a watch.

0:00
board this evening we often have your
0:03
field Deputy Sean Silva here to give you
0:07
these updates but it was really
0:09
important for me that you all hear from
0:13
me directly this week so I am here to
0:16
give you your government update I have a
0:19
number of things that I want to talk to
0:21
you about I want to start with our
0:24
updates on the Community Plan update
0:26
that I came in just as I was catching
0:28
the tail end of the summary from last
0:31
week’s ad hoc committee meeting I think
0:34
we were all really excited to see the
0:37
level of Engagement and I was personally
0:40
really glad to have been invited and for
0:43
my team and I to have had the
0:44
opportunity to attend the meeting and to
0:47
hear from the community directly during
0:50
both public comment as well as the
0:53
community presentations
0:54
I am a little bit concerned however
0:57
about some misinformation that was
1:00
circulated both before and since about
1:05
the process
1:06
I think you on the board all know but
1:11
many members of the public didn’t know
1:14
and were not told this when they were
1:17
advised to attend the ad hoc team and
1:20
that is the community plan updates all
1:23
over the city have been underway for
1:26
many years now and I want to be very
1:30
clear about this my office was not
1:33
involved in the preparation of those
1:37
plan updates we received the drafts at
1:41
the same time they were released to the
1:43
public a couple of months ago since then
1:46
we have reviewed the plans and we have
1:49
met with community members and
1:51
stakeholders to discuss them we also met
1:54
with planning staff to advise them that
1:57
we were not satisfied with the current
2:00
drafts and the current proposals and
2:03
that further Community feedback needed
2:05
to be obtained and Incorporated
2:08
I was very clear throughout my campaign
2:12
and I hope and I believe that I have
2:14
been very clear since that local land
2:17
use decisions should be made at the
2:20
local level not by bureaucrats in
2:22
Sacramento
2:24
and my top priority is ensuring that
2:27
every Community has a voice in the
2:29
future development of their neighborhood
2:32
and that is why I directed planning to
2:35
go back to the neighborhood councils and
2:38
present again on their Draft plans
2:42
um and it’s also the reason that my
2:45
office is going to be leading our own
2:47
listening sessions to solicit feedback
2:50
directly from the community so that we
2:53
can make decisions as a community about
2:57
what is going to go into those updates
2:59
so uh CD 11 is hosting Westchester Playa
3:04
listening sessions uh from September
3:08
25th through October 6th
3:11
so you can look for an update in our
3:14
Weekly Newsletter on Saturday our
3:16
federal 11 updates you can sign up there
3:19
you can also go directly to the cd11
3:22
website and sign up through our website
3:26
to get a slot the feedback that we
3:29
obtain both through the neighborhood
3:32
Council process and through the
3:34
listening sessions that we will be
3:36
hosting as the cd11 office will be
3:39
passed back to the planning department
3:41
so even though I share your concerns and
3:45
I am going to do everything in my power
3:48
to make these changes for you
3:52
the fact remains that many dozens of
3:54
housing laws have come out of Sacramento
3:57
in the last several years and I want to
4:00
be very clear I did not vote on sb9 or
4:04
a 10. and like many of you and like many
4:07
of the people that we heard from in
4:09
public comment last week
4:11
I share concerns about the impacts on
4:14
our existing residential neighborhoods
4:16
and traffic and our infrastructure
4:20
and some of the very images that we were
4:23
shown in the ad hoc committee meeting
4:25
last week show us in real time what the
4:28
impacts of s b 9 and 10 look like
4:31
now those are state laws that we are
4:34
currently stuck with
4:37
and our best case scenario is to use the
4:41
Community Plan update process to make
4:44
responsible Collective and collaborative
4:47
decisions about where densification
4:51
should go and what strategies we can use
4:53
to preserve our single-family
4:55
neighborhoods
4:57
in the meantime I highly highly
5:00
recommend to you that you reach out to
5:03
your State Assembly members and make
5:06
your positions on densification and
5:09
state housing laws known directly to
5:11
them
5:13
there were also some comments that were
5:16
made
5:16
during last week at Hawks committee
5:19
meeting that I wanted to address because
5:21
they’re not accurate
5:24
one of the things that we heard that was
5:26
not true was that certain communities
5:29
are being Exempted from the community
5:32
plan update process
5:34
so let me be very clear on the record
5:37
about this now every community in CD 11
5:41
every community in Los Angeles is going
5:45
through a community plan update process
5:49
they’re in different phases depending on
5:52
when their plan was last updated
5:55
currently the communities in the
5:58
southern end of council District 11 are
6:02
going through their plan updates
6:04
the communities in the northern end of
6:06
the district will be next
6:09
another very important clarification
6:12
that I want to make relates to sb423
6:16
this is another state housing law
6:20
authored by the very same assembly
6:23
member who brought us sb9
6:26
SB 423 pushes densification across the
6:30
entire State of California and the city
6:32
of Los Angeles Los Angeles with limited
6:35
or no review
6:37
IT addresses how projects are reviewed
6:40
not where they can and can’t go
6:44
densification in our sensitive
6:47
environmental areas like our coastal
6:49
zone and our high fire severity zones
6:52
are huge concerns for obvious reasons
6:57
that’s why I introduced a motion and
7:00
counsel seeking a modification to s b
7:03
423 that would continue to require State
7:07
mandated review of multi-family housing
7:09
in those Hazard areas
7:12
and I want to be very clear about this
7:14
in no way does that exempt the coastal
7:17
zone or the high fire severity Zone from
7:19
contributing to affordable housing or
7:23
multi-family housing
7:25
it simply means that environmental and
7:28
fire mitigation efforts have to be
7:30
assessed and mitigated that’s all it
7:33
means
7:34
I also want to be clear that my
7:37
resolution is not based on economics or
7:40
any other demographics
7:42
the coastal zone actually includes parts
7:45
of Playa del Rey and some of the most
7:47
economically diverse portions of Venice
7:50
and all of council District 15.
7:53
our high fire severity zones do cover
7:56
neighborhoods in the Santa Monica
7:58
Mountains but they also include much of
8:01
the socio-economically diverse
8:03
communities near the sound of Susanna
8:05
Mountains and the San Gabriel mountains
8:08
and with tragic incidents like what
8:10
happened recently in Maui and the
8:13
paradise Fire or the Woolsey fire and
8:15
countless other examples
8:17
densification and commercialization in
8:20
those areas is something that we have to
8:22
be concerned about
8:24
and my resolution seeks basic review for
8:28
multi-family housing projects in those
8:30
zones so that motion has been continued
8:35
on the council agenda to September 12th
8:38
and so if anybody has any additional
8:40
feedback or questions or comments or
8:43
clarifications they would like about any
8:45
of the above please feel free to reach
8:47
out
8:48
and I would also just suggest that if
8:50
any of you members of this board or
8:53
members of the public hear something
8:55
that doesn’t sound right to you
8:57
something on social media you get a
8:59
flyer in your mailbox and it doesn’t
9:01
seem like it came from my office or it
9:04
came from me it probably didn’t
9:07
so please feel free to reach out
9:09
directly to me and my team if there is
9:12
ever a question or a concern whether it
9:15
relates to local development issues or
9:18
any other local issue
9:20
issue we are here to help we are here to
9:22
partner with you I am here to advocate
9:25
for Westchester Playa del Rey in this
9:28
in this land update I have heard these
9:30
concerns loud and clear I share them and
9:33
my task in this is to take the feedback
9:35
and make sure we end up with a final
9:38
product
9:39
that is what the community wants because
9:42
I do believe that we should be making
9:44
these decisions here as a community
9:48
so with that I would like to move on to
9:51
a couple of other updates from City Hall
9:53
uh there have been some

If you have questions about her motion, drop a comment. I understood the motion and have been trying to explain it to others, but some continue to insist the motion is to protect wealthy neighborhoods from the same densification we’re facing with our Community Plan Update. The motion does not do that in the least. The tsunami of housing laws are confusing. I get that.

Please sign and share our petition!

 

Tracy is active in a number of local community organizations including the Neighborhood Council PLUC, Neighborhood Council Ad Hoc CPU Committee, Kentwood Home Guardians and Emerson Ave Community Garden Club. The views expressed in this post are Tracy’s alone, and should not be construed in any way as an opinion of any other group. Are you planning a meeting with the planners? Have Tracy along to make sure you get the same information other community members get. Are you willing to host a group of your neighbors for a talk? Tracy would be happy to join you.


About Tracy Thrower Conyers Tracy Thrower Conyers is a long-time resident of Westchester 90045. Tracy closely follows local politics, political players and social chatter relevant to Westchester. You’ll frequently find her at Neighborhood Council meetings, as well as on all the social platforms where 90045 peeps hang out. Tracy is a real estate broker and founding principal in Silicon Beach Properties. She is a recognized expert on Silicon Beach and its impact on residential and residential income real estate, and has been featured by respected media outlets including the LA Times, KPCC and KCET. Tracy is also a licensed attorney and accidental housing policy junkie.

We Have A Better Plan

Community Alliance Concerned For Westchester Playa has a better plan for our community than what the city put on the table.

Last week at the community meeting I sat through yet one more presentation by city planners telling us our community hasn’t done its fair share to provide housing in LA and in particular, affordable housing.

7 slides out of 45 were dedicated to fair housing, code for “you’re part of the westside and you need to take a bigger share of units.” It’s only fair after all for some bizarre undisclosed reason….

The logic, in case you miss the irony, is that the city wants to take our westside communities, the ones we worked so hard to make desirable, and stuff them with less desirable housing stock, thereby dragging down the community’s desirability. Who does that benefit again?

Oh yeah. The developers who get to build that crap, but I digress.

The planners then followed with a blatantly false slide claiming we’ve only built 45 affordable units from 2009 to 2020. Maybe they missed Phase 2 of Playa Vista?

And that was just the wind up to the slides about their stupid high density plans for us. 🤮🤮

And not even a passing nod to all the existing affordable housing they’re willing to raze in our community in the name of high-rise market rate boxes, nor any kind of nod to the fact that Westchester already provides some of the most affordable housing on the westside.

And certainly no nod to the idea our streets are overburdened with traffic in and out of a world airport with expansion plans.

No, they have orders to rezone our little Mayberry for tens of thousands of high-rise units and like the good little soldiers they are, that is the unimaginative plan they put on the table.

Not even a cute little Village in sight.

They would have learned the error of their ways, had they bothered to stick around and listen to our counter plan. Instead, they waited around a token five minutes while the first community presentation started and then snuck out the back door.

I’ve heard them say many times they want our input, yet the first opportunity they had to hear it, they bolted.

And the presentations were impressive. You could tell all four groups worked very hard to provide thoughtful commentary. Our councilperson stuck it out and listened to everything, but the planners were long gone.

Our group recorded our plan, using the slides from our presentation on Monday. Watch the video and then please share with your neighbors and other Westchester friends and family.

Feedback we’ve already received on the video is that it’s easy to watch, so please take a few minutes and watch.

Read more about my meeting observations in Tracy’s Post-Meeting Observations.

If you’re still not mad, read High-Rise Next To My Home? Say What?

Please Sign Our Petition

 


Tracy is active in a number of local community organizations including the Neighborhood Council PLUC, Neighborhood Council Ad Hoc CPU Committee, Kentwood Home Guardians and Emerson Ave Community Garden Club. The views expressed in this post are Tracy’s alone, and should not be construed in any way as an opinion of any other group. Are you planning a meeting with the planners? Have Tracy along to make sure you get the same information other community members get. Are you willing to host a group of your neighbors for a talk? Tracy would be happy to join you.


About Tracy Thrower Conyers Tracy Thrower Conyers is a long-time resident of Westchester 90045. Tracy closely follows local politics, political players and social chatter relevant to Westchester. You’ll frequently find her at Neighborhood Council meetings, as well as on all the social platforms where 90045 peeps hang out. Tracy is a real estate broker and founding principal in Silicon Beach Properties. She is a recognized expert on Silicon Beach and its impact on residential and residential income real estate, and has been featured by respected media outlets including the LA Times, KPCC and KCET. Tracy is also a licensed attorney and accidental housing policy junkie.

Tracy’s Post-Meeting Observations

Monday was the big meeting with Traci Park and our Community Plan Update planners. We had a great turn out for the Alliance Rally beforehand and the press turned out as well.

Unfortunately, only half the people who came could get into the room due to capacity restrictions. Traci Park vowed to support us in having more meetings and we say yes to that!

Here are the slides from the Alliance Presentation. Sadly, we went last and most of the audience had dropped out by then. Click the image to see the slides:

The meeting was relatively productive and our councilwoman stayed to the very end, unlike the planners who stayed a token five minutes after their presentation, but then bailed.

The planners tell us all the time they want to hear from us, but couldn’t be bothered to stay for four community presentations. Go figure.

One thing I heard from the planners during their presentation that I thought was particularly alarming was a statement that our plan won’t be adopted until 2025.

While this is technically correct, it is problematic because it gives the impression there is no urgency. What they failed to say is that once the very expensive EIR process starts in January, our chances of significantly altering the plan are slim.

Possibly the planners are going to throw the kitchen sink into EIR and it can be slimmed down from there, but that is risky. And it will give us all a heart attack.

What we all need to do now is put our collective feet to the pedal and alert our neighbors what is happening. 400 people turning out for a meeting is awesome, but we have at least 20K people in our plan area. There are so many people who need to know what is happening.

Please sign and share our petition!

The Alliance recorded the meeting but we’re having problems with the file. A 3-1/2 hour meeting is no joke for a video file. We are continuing to work on making it usable and will share when we can.

Meanwhile we are planning other ways to share the Alliance Plan.

Below is my personal take on each of the community presentations.

Preserve Westchester presented first. There is a lot of overlap between their views and those of the Alliance. Where we primarily diverge is their support for upzoning (if we have to upzone at all) along the corridors. The Alliance believes our corridors are already too burdened by LAX travelers and South Bay commuter traffic.

Build A Better Westchester spoke second. I agree with two of their main points. They believe the CPU can be an opportunity and they believe we need more affordable housing. Where I thought they fell short was in their lack of research and lack of understanding how the CPU plans to raze wide swaths of existing affordable housing in favor of high rise market rate units we don’t need.

Stakeholder John Birkett presented third on the implications of having LAX as a neighbor. I and the Alliance completely agree that our community is already burdened enough with LAX traffic and doubling our population is absurd. Read City Planning Has Lost Its Mind. Is LAX Watching? for more on our views on the topic of LAX.

Finally the Alliance got to present. The entire Alliance worked very hard on the presentation and it showed in the depth of research, the beautiful slides and thoughtful plan recommendations.

What do you think we should do next to shine a light on the CPU and share our message with neighbors? Drop a reply below. We are particularly happy to talk to neighbor groups if you want to organize a back yard event

Please sign and share our petition!

 


Tracy is active in a number of local community organizations including the Neighborhood Council PLUC, Neighborhood Council Ad Hoc CPU Committee, Kentwood Home Guardians and Emerson Ave Community Garden Club. The views expressed in this post are Tracy’s alone, and should not be construed in any way as an opinion of any other group. Are you planning a meeting with the planners? Have Tracy along to make sure you get the same information other community members get. Are you willing to host a group of your neighbors for a talk? Tracy would be happy to join you.


About Tracy Thrower Conyers Tracy Thrower Conyers is a long-time resident of Westchester 90045. Tracy closely follows local politics, political players and social chatter relevant to Westchester. You’ll frequently find her at Neighborhood Council meetings, as well as on all the social platforms where 90045 peeps hang out. Tracy is a real estate broker and founding principal in Silicon Beach Properties. She is a recognized expert on Silicon Beach and its impact on residential and residential income real estate, and has been featured by respected media outlets including the LA Times, KPCC and KCET. Tracy is also a licensed attorney and accidental housing policy junkie.

New Location For Community Meeting On 8/28

Our volunteers have been busy distributing 10,000 flyers in our community about Monday’s important meeting.

Just as the printer was finishing up, word came that the location had to change. 😳

Please tell your friends and neighbors to come to Senior Center on Monday, not the Rec Center.

And a huge thank you to our flyer distribution volunteers for helping to get the word out!!

Please join us for the rally beforehand at 5:30 if you can!!

Do We Finally Have The Full Plan?

The CPU Process Starts

Draft 1 of our Community Plan Update from City Planning was a very straightforward affair with lots of community meetings and community input back in 2020. Then COVID happened and everything stopped. Post-COVID, the city seems to have forgotten it has community stakeholders, at least in Westchester Playa.

The CPU Process Restarts But Differently

As the city started back up with our CPU, it formed a 52-member Advisory Group with only five members from Westchester even though we are 25% of the four westside communities working our CPUs together. Oh, and four of those people were chosen to represent special interest groups, not us. More about the Advisory Group here.

The Advisory Group would be the only party in the conversation with Planning about our CPU, if Planning had its way. They were only meeting with the Advisory Group and were only posting updates to that group’s website.

Then the public caught wind of what was going on and groups like members of our Alliance started shining a light on the new drafts and demanding meetings with the planners.

The Advisory Group strategy was a 180 degree pivot from the full public strategy of the first draft and an abject failure.

Where We’re At Now In The Process

Below are the maps provided to the Advisory Group but not stakeholders (unless you happened to know where to look and happened to do so, like we did).

These maps are supposed to be consolidated before the end of the year and we’re told the public gets more input, but we fear that input will be in the EIR process when the maps are mostly set.

The first map was called the Residential Map. We thought it was the full residential plan and we all almost had heart attacks by the gross density proposed in that map, especially around the Sepulveda/Manchester Quadrant.

Then the Commercial Map dropped and we were shocked to see how much more density the city thinks we are willing to pile on top of commercial businesses, in addition to what is in the Residential Map.

Oh, and then the Industrial Map dropped. What? It took me several reads to discover that yet more housing is contained on this map.

Seriously? Did you know that Westchester is forecast to decline in population? Why do we need three maps worth of grossly densified high-rises in a community that was built for single family homes and doesn’t have the infrastructure to be the Wilshire Corridor of the beach cities?

Not to mention a community landlocked by the 405, Marina Channel/Kentwood Bluffs, Pacific Ocean and LAX.

And speaking of LAX, these densification plans are going to wreak havoc with LAX’s plans to grow flights. The whole plan is stupid. It’s not innovative and it’s not inspired. It’s straight up gross densification for the sake of stuffing in a bunch market rate boxes.

Is This The Whole Plan?

We’ve been told our planners are done dropping maps, other than a consolidated map promised for September. Hopefully we’re looking at the whole draft plan now.

As a reminder, we are in the CPU process with three other westside communities – Venice, Palms/Mar Vista/Del Rey and West LA under the cutesy name of “Planning The Westside.”

Why the other CD-11 communities of Brentwood, Pacific Palisades and Ladera aren’t in this “westside” plan with us remains a mystery, although we have some theories.

The combined maps can be found here, here and here. But don’t forget you have to also read the separate supporting documents to even begin to read the maps (correspondence tables, GPLU keys, policy documents, housing element and maybe things we don’t even know about yet).

For your convenience, I’ve excerpted images of the Westchester Playa maps below for a quick visual, but as mentioned above the maps do not tell the entire story, sadly.

The Westchester Playa Plan

The entire plan is so grossly full of density and high-rises, even the city couldn’t capture it all in one map. Here are our three maps, all with residential implications.

The Residential Map

The residential map was apparently drawn with a new Manchester/Sepulveda TOC in mind, as well as the new Hindry light rail metro station. More has been written on the TOC here and the Osage commercial plan here.

click to enlarge

The Commercial Map

click to enlarge

The Industrial Map

click to enlarge

Does This Plan Provide Affordable Housing?

A lot of people accept the “we need density” narrative because they are told that is how we get affordable housing.

The narrative is, sadly, partially true. The only mechanism the city currently uses to incentivize affordable units is to provide extras to market rate developers to build a couple of token affordable units. 

In fact, I’ve been in meetings with the planners recently where they admit we need gross densification to meet our affordable housing targets.

Did you take that in? We’re supposed to absorb thousands of ugly boxes we don’t need to get a few affordable units. Does that make any sense? Is that a good use of our resources?

How about the city ponies up to subsidize developers to build more affordable units instead of giving away our low density communities for random acts of blighted densification??

Are You Mad Yet?

What do you think about the maps and the plan? Not mad yet? Read this.

Mad enough to sign our petition? Find it here.

Mad enough to hit the streets with us? Find out how you can help here.


Tracy is active in a number of local community organizations including the Neighborhood Council PLUC, Neighborhood Council Ad Hoc CPU Committee, Kentwood Home Guardians and Emerson Ave Community Garden Club. The views expressed in this post are Tracy’s alone, and should not be construed in any way as an opinion of any other group. Are you planning a meeting with the planners? Have Tracy along to make sure you get the same information other community members get. Are you willing to host a group of your neighbors for a talk? Tracy would be happy to join you.


About Tracy Thrower Conyers Tracy Thrower Conyers is a long-time resident of Westchester 90045. Tracy closely follows local politics, political players and social chatter relevant to Westchester. You’ll frequently find her at Neighborhood Council meetings, as well as on all the social platforms where 90045 peeps hang out. Tracy is a real estate broker and founding principal in Silicon Beach Properties. She is a recognized expert on Silicon Beach and its impact on residential and residential income real estate, and has been featured by respected media outlets including the LA Times, KPCC and KCET. Tracy is also a licensed attorney and accidental housing policy junkie.  

The Alliance Hard At Work

Lisa Gaines & Traci Park

Community Alliance – Concerned for Westchester Playa was out in the community today gathering signatures for our petition. Today it was the Senior Picnic at Westchester Park. Members Lisa Gaines and Kiki Shishido gathered 100 signatures and helped spread the word about high-rises planned for Westchester Playa. Great work ladies!

And they bumped into a special dignitary while they were at it! Great to see our Councilwoman visiting Westchester. 😍

Community Alliance - Concerned for Westchester Playa Petition Gathering Booth
click to enlarge
Community Alliance - Concerned for Westchester Playa Petition Flyer
click to enlarge
Community Alliance - Concerned for Westchester Playa Residential Maps Flyer
click to enlarge