Kentwood Is Looking At Big Impacts

Sleepy Kentwood, Big Impacts

Kentwood is a place I’ve called home for over 20 years. My husband and I were newlyweds and expecting our first baby when we bought our home.

The community is roughly bounded by Sepulveda, the Kentwood Bluffs, McConnell/Georgetown and Manchester. Kentwood is predominantly made up of a 3400 property homeowners association called Kentwood Home Guardians.

Kentwood is a very large physical portion of Westchester and consequently is subject to a lot of the city’s upzoning plans in the Community Plan Update (“CPU”) for Westchester Playa, second only to the wallop Osage is looking at.

Please sign and share our petition!

How Did We Get To This Point?

CPUs were announced for four westside communities in 2017. Inexplicably, Brentwood and Pacific Palisades were not included in this program, even though they are westside communities also due for updates to their CPUs. The project was supposed to last three years.

The first draft of the CPU dropped in mid-2020. The biggest impact for Kentwood was a dramatic upzoning of Manchester and rezoning our neighbors on 85th Place:

click to enlarge

This is the full plan with some Kentwood implications, but primarily commercial implications along our corridors (mostly Manchester):

click to enlarge

Anybody who saw the first draft nearly lost their minds with the aggressive upzoning. Kentwood Home Guardians held meetings about the plan for Westchester Playa. Our Neighborhood Council formed a special committee to study the plan.

A private group of leaders in our community worked very hard to write a coherent response to the draft. Who knew those would be the good ole days?

Then came COVID and everything stopped. 

The Advisory Group

We knew the city was picking up the project again when it announced its handpicked Advisory Group in late 2022 for the combined CPU project known as “Planning The Westside.”

The Advisory Group was chosen by the City to be the sole voice to comment on the next round of drafts of our CPU. In fact, unbeknownst to us mere stakeholders, drafts were only provided to the Advisory Group via a special website.

Despite Westchester Playa being 25% of the combined plan areas, our area was given only five seats on the Advisory Group (out of 52), and all were for special interest groups. Not one person sat at that table for residential stakeholders in Westchester or Kentwood.One group member was the chair of the Planning & Land Use Committee for our Neighborhood Council, but nobody sat at that table tasked with speaking for residential stakeholders in our community.

Please sign and share our petition!

The Next Draft Plan Starts Dribbling Out

The next draft plan dribbled out only to the Advisory Group website and via three different maps, titled Residential Map, Commercial Map and Industrial Map.

These maps were not announced to the general public. They were posted only on the Advisory Group Website and the rest of us were left to discover them on our own.

And discover them we did. And we’re hopping mad at what we found.

Residential Map Implications On Kentwood

The Residential Map for the Community Plan Update shows Kentwood’s southeast section (WPDR 3) being radically upzoned from single-family to six on a lot (one unit per 1,000′ of lot). Read our full Residential Map analysis here.

WPDR Prosposed Residential CPU Upzoning
click to enlarge

Why Kentwood In The Southeast Corner?

We can’t figure out exactly why Kentwood is being targeted for radical upzoning (as in 6 units on a lot), but we’ve sleuthed out two possible reasons.

The first possible reason is a TOC designation at Sepulveda/Manchester, which I wrote more about in City Planning Has Lost Its Mind. Is LAX Watching? 

The problem with TOCs based on bus service is that they are transitory. A developer can get big incentives to build density in a TOC and then overnight buses can fall out of favor.

And when did anybody paying market rate for a new apartment even take the bus?

I digress.

The second possible reason this particular cluster of upzoning might be because a metro rail stop is coming to Manchester/Sepulveda in about 30 years. Cue the eyeroll.

How Bad Could It Get?

No matter what the reason, the southeast corner of Kentwood is currently marked for upzoning that could result in as many as 2310 units. That is a 6x increase in units in a small area.

And that might not even be the worst case scenario. 😳

The Correspondence Key for the Residential Map says 4 on a lot (“4L”) is our limit, but the planners have been vague about whether ADUs are allowed in addition to the 4 units, bringing the 5 unit threshold into play.

Let’s just say that my calculation of 2310 units in southeast Kentwood might be the best case scenario. The Housing Element is lurking in the background and we definitely need to start looking at it more closely.

What Other Consequences Might We Be Forgetting?

Builders developing on single family lots do not have to make infrastructure contributions and due to the proximity of the TOC, will not have to provide parking.

And please don’t forget that only a fraction of this density craziness will provide any affordable housing (as in like 10% which leaves us with the other 90%  to deal with for no good reason).

We will be blighted with high-rise market rate boxes that forecasted declines in our Westchester population simply do not support.

Will all these units be built? No, but that is the worst part of the problem.

The city plans to rezone, not take your property in exchange for fair market value and develop a coherent, cohesive vision now.

Rezoning simply means that any random developer can buy the lot next door to you and build whatever crazy project the new zoning will allow, whether we need it or not, and without community input.

This is worse than eminent domain. We’ll all be tripping over each other to be the first to sell before our property is diminished in value by the 5-story monstrosity next door. Yuck!

The Residential Map is a big problem for Kentwood.

Please sign and share our petition!

Commercial Map Implications On Kentwood

Then came the Commercial Map. Notwithstanding its name, this map is really more residential than commercial. It contemplates first floor commercial with stories and stories of units over the commercial uses.

click to enlarge

There are multiple implications for Kentwood on the Commercial Map. First, the map still shows rezoning for Manchester from the first draft plan, marked as WPDR 12 on this map. 

The area, shown in light pink on the new map, will be zoned as a “Neighborhood Center.” Neighborhood Centers can be 3-5 stories and will range from 1 residential unit/1200′ of lot space to 1 residential unit/200′ of lot space.

If the lot next door to you in a Neighborhood Center district is 6,000′ (typical in Kentwood), that means five units to 30 units up close and personal to you on the lot next door.

Can you imagine 30 units next door???

And the same is true for the Little Von’s area, marked as WPDR 16 on the map, as well as WPDR 13 along Sepulveda in South Kentwood.

And that’s just the LIGHT pink implications.

Look at WPDR 18 & 19, the dark pink districts. Those are marked on the map as encroaching north Kentwood and gobbling up Arizona, if not also Alverstone (it’s very hard to read these maps).

Dark pink represents “Community Centers” and those can be up to 8 stories and allow five units to 15 units per 6000′ of lot space.

As you can see, Kentwood is getting slammed on the Commercial Map, too. 😟

Industrial Map Implications On Kentwood

Well hallelujah! Nothing on the Industrial Map to report for Kentwood. 

click to enlarge

It is hard to read the map, but WPDR 27 & 31 are not in Kentwood. They are Arizona Circle on Centinela.

Nothing to see here, thank goodness.

Please sign and share our petition!

What Comes Next?

The planners say they’ll work on a combined map and issue it in October-ish. That map will be the plan that goes into the EIR process in January. The planners have indicated they might send two plans into EIR.

The EIR process is about studying the “impacts” of the proposed plan(s). Many of our questions to the planners have been deferred as relating to “impacts.”

The EIR process is also when the planners plan to “solicit” our input.

You don’t have to wait until then. The planners claim they are reading all email now. If you’d like to give them an earful, here is their contact info. 😁 

Is All Lost?

Is it time to sell and get out of Dodge? Hopefully not. I know many of us have been in Kentwood for decades and love our little Mayberry.

The planners sit in cubicles and draw these maps. They are not paying attention to the fact Kentwood is landlocked and they are not paying attention to the implications of LAX on our arteries. They definitely haven’t acknowledged that we have 2 million square feet of commercial space coming with the Northside Project.

The Alliance hopes to bring these facts to their attention. How can they really (with a straight face) say they want 15-story residential buildings on Sepulveda when that is a main arterial for LAX?

How can they add huge density to Manchester when that is our main east west corridor? And inland beach goers use it to access beaches. Playa del Rey will need Manchester for emergency purposes if there is a tsunami. 

Where is common sense in this process?

Planners have waved off these questions, claiming they’ll be reviewed in the EIR process. The Alliance, with your help, wants them to acknowledge these limitations now, even before the EIR process, but we’ll see.

For sure we need more Kentwood neighbors paying attention to this process and willing to activate on request during the EIR process. We have got to show up as engaged and informed. There is a tremendous amount of political will both at city hall and in Sacramento behind the narrative that we need to “build our way out of our housing crisis.”

Follow our website for updates and please share it with your neighbors. We are following developments very closely and regularly meeting with our planners and other city representatives and posting what we learn to help shine a light on this process.

What Else Can You Do?

Please support the Alliance. The Alliance is comprised of residents from most of our neighborhoods and seeks to speak for our entire Westchester Playa community. We need a united voice and it’s not enough for Kentwood to rise up and say “no” to upzoning. There needs to be a broader plan for the entire plan area that the city will accept.

The Broader Housing Element

At the time this page was published, the content offered is strictly about the Community Plan Update. Be aware that the city is also working on its Housing Element with additional zoning implications for Westchester and Kentwood. We will update this page as more is learned.

Please sign and share our petition!

 


Tracy is active in a number of local community organizations including the Neighborhood Council PLUC, Neighborhood Council Ad Hoc CPU Committee, Kentwood Home Guardians and Emerson Ave Community Garden Club. The views expressed in this post are Tracy’s alone, and should not be construed in any way as an opinion of any other group. Are you planning a meeting with the planners? Have Tracy along to make sure you get the same information other community members get. Are you willing to host a group of your neighbors for a talk? Tracy and Lisa would be happy to join you.


About Tracy Thrower Conyers Tracy Thrower Conyers is a long-time resident of Westchester 90045. Tracy closely follows local politics, political players and social chatter relevant to Westchester. You’ll frequently find her at Neighborhood Council meetings, as well as on all the social platforms where 90045 peeps hang out. Tracy is a real estate broker and founding principal in Silicon Beach Properties. She is a recognized expert on Silicon Beach and its impact on residential and residential income real estate, and has been featured by respected media outlets including the LA Times, KPCC and KCET. Tracy is also a licensed attorney and accidental housing policy junkie.

Tracy’s Post-Meeting Observations

Monday was the big meeting with Traci Park and our Community Plan Update planners. We had a great turn out for the Alliance Rally beforehand and the press turned out as well.

Unfortunately, only half the people who came could get into the room due to capacity restrictions. Traci Park vowed to support us in having more meetings and we say yes to that!

Here are the slides from the Alliance Presentation. Sadly, we went last and most of the audience had dropped out by then. Click the image to see the slides:

The meeting was relatively productive and our councilwoman stayed to the very end, unlike the planners who stayed a token five minutes after their presentation, but then bailed.

The planners tell us all the time they want to hear from us, but couldn’t be bothered to stay for four community presentations. Go figure.

One thing I heard from the planners during their presentation that I thought was particularly alarming was a statement that our plan won’t be adopted until 2025.

While this is technically correct, it is problematic because it gives the impression there is no urgency. What they failed to say is that once the very expensive EIR process starts in January, our chances of significantly altering the plan are slim.

Possibly the planners are going to throw the kitchen sink into EIR and it can be slimmed down from there, but that is risky. And it will give us all a heart attack.

What we all need to do now is put our collective feet to the pedal and alert our neighbors what is happening. 400 people turning out for a meeting is awesome, but we have at least 20K people in our plan area. There are so many people who need to know what is happening.

Please sign and share our petition!

The Alliance recorded the meeting but we’re having problems with the file. A 3-1/2 hour meeting is no joke for a video file. We are continuing to work on making it usable and will share when we can.

Meanwhile we are planning other ways to share the Alliance Plan.

Below is my personal take on each of the community presentations.

Preserve Westchester presented first. There is a lot of overlap between their views and those of the Alliance. Where we primarily diverge is their support for upzoning (if we have to upzone at all) along the corridors. The Alliance believes our corridors are already too burdened by LAX travelers and South Bay commuter traffic.

Build A Better Westchester spoke second. I agree with two of their main points. They believe the CPU can be an opportunity and they believe we need more affordable housing. Where I thought they fell short was in their lack of research and lack of understanding how the CPU plans to raze wide swaths of existing affordable housing in favor of high rise market rate units we don’t need.

Stakeholder John Birkett presented third on the implications of having LAX as a neighbor. I and the Alliance completely agree that our community is already burdened enough with LAX traffic and doubling our population is absurd. Read City Planning Has Lost Its Mind. Is LAX Watching? for more on our views on the topic of LAX.

Finally the Alliance got to present. The entire Alliance worked very hard on the presentation and it showed in the depth of research, the beautiful slides and thoughtful plan recommendations.

What do you think we should do next to shine a light on the CPU and share our message with neighbors? Drop a reply below. We are particularly happy to talk to neighbor groups if you want to organize a back yard event

Please sign and share our petition!

 


Tracy is active in a number of local community organizations including the Neighborhood Council PLUC, Neighborhood Council Ad Hoc CPU Committee, Kentwood Home Guardians and Emerson Ave Community Garden Club. The views expressed in this post are Tracy’s alone, and should not be construed in any way as an opinion of any other group. Are you planning a meeting with the planners? Have Tracy along to make sure you get the same information other community members get. Are you willing to host a group of your neighbors for a talk? Tracy would be happy to join you.


About Tracy Thrower Conyers Tracy Thrower Conyers is a long-time resident of Westchester 90045. Tracy closely follows local politics, political players and social chatter relevant to Westchester. You’ll frequently find her at Neighborhood Council meetings, as well as on all the social platforms where 90045 peeps hang out. Tracy is a real estate broker and founding principal in Silicon Beach Properties. She is a recognized expert on Silicon Beach and its impact on residential and residential income real estate, and has been featured by respected media outlets including the LA Times, KPCC and KCET. Tracy is also a licensed attorney and accidental housing policy junkie.

New Location For Community Meeting On 8/28

Our volunteers have been busy distributing 10,000 flyers in our community about Monday’s important meeting.

Just as the printer was finishing up, word came that the location had to change. 😳

Please tell your friends and neighbors to come to Senior Center on Monday, not the Rec Center.

And a huge thank you to our flyer distribution volunteers for helping to get the word out!!

Please join us for the rally beforehand at 5:30 if you can!!

But Wait! There’s More

Alliance - Citizens Concerned For Westchester Playa

We’ve been working mightily over here to catch our neighbors up on the craziness with our Community Plan Update. We described the plan as we know it. We outlined all the problems we’ve discovered with the plan (here and here).

What if I told you there was more??

Yes, friends, there is another housing plan on a parallel track to our CPU with yet more housing implications.

In addition to our CPU, the city is also updating its Housing Element and proposing a raft of rezoning proposals for that initiative, including six program concepts: adaptive reuse, updates to affordable housing incentive programs, opportunity corridors, the affordable housing overlay, missing middle and process streamlining. 😳

The schedule to adopt this program is even more aggressive than our Community Plan Update.

If we’re not careful, we’re going to be slammed by a boatload of densification from the Housing Element while we’re all distracted and concerned by our CPU.

Why does the Housing Element matter to us? Because it’s core objective is to “focus new housing capacity in Higher Opportunity Areas” and the westside, including us, is who they’re looking at.

This is the developer giveaways piled on top of the CPU developer give aways. Can you say high-rise next door?

We might have missed our initial opportunity to provide the loudest input on the first draft of the element, but they will share/publish soon and listen again.

Meanwhile, each of us still has an opportunity to individually share our thoughts and hopefully the city is still listening. Fill out the survey here.

I know it’s confusing. We’re under assault from several angles. Stay tuned. We’re working overtime at the Alliance to keep you up to speed on developments.

In the meantime, sign our CPU petition and we promise to start following and providing updates on the Housing Element.

Do We Finally Have The Full Plan?

The CPU Process Starts

Draft 1 of our Community Plan Update from City Planning was a very straightforward affair with lots of community meetings and community input back in 2020. Then COVID happened and everything stopped. Post-COVID, the city seems to have forgotten it has community stakeholders, at least in Westchester Playa.

The CPU Process Restarts But Differently

As the city started back up with our CPU, it formed a 52-member Advisory Group with only five members from Westchester even though we are 25% of the four westside communities working our CPUs together. Oh, and four of those people were chosen to represent special interest groups, not us. More about the Advisory Group here.

The Advisory Group would be the only party in the conversation with Planning about our CPU, if Planning had its way. They were only meeting with the Advisory Group and were only posting updates to that group’s website.

Then the public caught wind of what was going on and groups like members of our Alliance started shining a light on the new drafts and demanding meetings with the planners.

The Advisory Group strategy was a 180 degree pivot from the full public strategy of the first draft and an abject failure.

Where We’re At Now In The Process

Below are the maps provided to the Advisory Group but not stakeholders (unless you happened to know where to look and happened to do so, like we did).

These maps are supposed to be consolidated before the end of the year and we’re told the public gets more input, but we fear that input will be in the EIR process when the maps are mostly set.

The first map was called the Residential Map. We thought it was the full residential plan and we all almost had heart attacks by the gross density proposed in that map, especially around the Sepulveda/Manchester Quadrant.

Then the Commercial Map dropped and we were shocked to see how much more density the city thinks we are willing to pile on top of commercial businesses, in addition to what is in the Residential Map.

Oh, and then the Industrial Map dropped. What? It took me several reads to discover that yet more housing is contained on this map.

Seriously? Did you know that Westchester is forecast to decline in population? Why do we need three maps worth of grossly densified high-rises in a community that was built for single family homes and doesn’t have the infrastructure to be the Wilshire Corridor of the beach cities?

Not to mention a community landlocked by the 405, Marina Channel/Kentwood Bluffs, Pacific Ocean and LAX.

And speaking of LAX, these densification plans are going to wreak havoc with LAX’s plans to grow flights. The whole plan is stupid. It’s not innovative and it’s not inspired. It’s straight up gross densification for the sake of stuffing in a bunch market rate boxes.

Is This The Whole Plan?

We’ve been told our planners are done dropping maps, other than a consolidated map promised for September. Hopefully we’re looking at the whole draft plan now.

As a reminder, we are in the CPU process with three other westside communities – Venice, Palms/Mar Vista/Del Rey and West LA under the cutesy name of “Planning The Westside.”

Why the other CD-11 communities of Brentwood, Pacific Palisades and Ladera aren’t in this “westside” plan with us remains a mystery, although we have some theories.

The combined maps can be found here, here and here. But don’t forget you have to also read the separate supporting documents to even begin to read the maps (correspondence tables, GPLU keys, policy documents, housing element and maybe things we don’t even know about yet).

For your convenience, I’ve excerpted images of the Westchester Playa maps below for a quick visual, but as mentioned above the maps do not tell the entire story, sadly.

The Westchester Playa Plan

The entire plan is so grossly full of density and high-rises, even the city couldn’t capture it all in one map. Here are our three maps, all with residential implications.

The Residential Map

The residential map was apparently drawn with a new Manchester/Sepulveda TOC in mind, as well as the new Hindry light rail metro station. More has been written on the TOC here and the Osage commercial plan here.

click to enlarge

The Commercial Map

click to enlarge

The Industrial Map

click to enlarge

Does This Plan Provide Affordable Housing?

A lot of people accept the “we need density” narrative because they are told that is how we get affordable housing.

The narrative is, sadly, partially true. The only mechanism the city currently uses to incentivize affordable units is to provide extras to market rate developers to build a couple of token affordable units. 

In fact, I’ve been in meetings with the planners recently where they admit we need gross densification to meet our affordable housing targets.

Did you take that in? We’re supposed to absorb thousands of ugly boxes we don’t need to get a few affordable units. Does that make any sense? Is that a good use of our resources?

How about the city ponies up to subsidize developers to build more affordable units instead of giving away our low density communities for random acts of blighted densification??

Are You Mad Yet?

What do you think about the maps and the plan? Not mad yet? Read this.

Mad enough to sign our petition? Find it here.

Mad enough to hit the streets with us? Find out how you can help here.


Tracy is active in a number of local community organizations including the Neighborhood Council PLUC, Neighborhood Council Ad Hoc CPU Committee, Kentwood Home Guardians and Emerson Ave Community Garden Club. The views expressed in this post are Tracy’s alone, and should not be construed in any way as an opinion of any other group. Are you planning a meeting with the planners? Have Tracy along to make sure you get the same information other community members get. Are you willing to host a group of your neighbors for a talk? Tracy would be happy to join you.


About Tracy Thrower Conyers Tracy Thrower Conyers is a long-time resident of Westchester 90045. Tracy closely follows local politics, political players and social chatter relevant to Westchester. You’ll frequently find her at Neighborhood Council meetings, as well as on all the social platforms where 90045 peeps hang out. Tracy is a real estate broker and founding principal in Silicon Beach Properties. She is a recognized expert on Silicon Beach and its impact on residential and residential income real estate, and has been featured by respected media outlets including the LA Times, KPCC and KCET. Tracy is also a licensed attorney and accidental housing policy junkie.  

And Another Map Drops

The maps! Back in 2020 when the CPU process started, we got one draft plan that was easy to wrap our brains around. And in fact, one community group did just that and came together to create a community response to the draft.

Fast forward three years and the city has turned the process of updating our community plan into such a convoluted process that it’s taken multiple maps and numerous accompanying keys to describe their plans to densify the “you know what” out of Continue reading “And Another Map Drops”

The Alliance Hard At Work

Lisa Gaines & Traci Park

Community Alliance – Concerned for Westchester Playa was out in the community today gathering signatures for our petition. Today it was the Senior Picnic at Westchester Park. Members Lisa Gaines and Kiki Shishido gathered 100 signatures and helped spread the word about high-rises planned for Westchester Playa. Great work ladies!

And they bumped into a special dignitary while they were at it! Great to see our Councilwoman visiting Westchester. 😍

Community Alliance - Concerned for Westchester Playa Petition Gathering Booth
click to enlarge
Community Alliance - Concerned for Westchester Playa Petition Flyer
click to enlarge
Community Alliance - Concerned for Westchester Playa Residential Maps Flyer
click to enlarge

 

City Planning Has Lost Its Mind. Is LAX Watching?

Westchester is currently undergoing a Community Plan Update (“CPU”) and Los Angeles is using CPUs as a big hammer in it current push to add massive density in housing units. In its blind haste to blight our communities with market rate boxes, the city recently designated a new Transit Oriented Community (“TOC”) designation at Manchester/Sepulveda.*

With TOCs come eye popping builder incentives to build mostly Continue reading “City Planning Has Lost Its Mind. Is LAX Watching?”

If You’re Not Mad, Read This

If you’re not mad about our Community Plan Update and how it’s rolling out, I daresay you don’t know about these 10 things:

1. Our Housing Target Is A Mystery

Every planner you talk to at the city thinks we have a dire housing shortage that will only be solved by adding almost 500,000 housing units in the city of LA, a 35% increase for a housing cycle that spans only seven years (June 2022 through December 2030). 

In fact, the city of Los Angeles has cooked up a plan to add 3x this number

I and other members of our Alliance have been in meeting after meeting with city planners and asked how many of these units Westchester Playa is Continue reading “If You’re Not Mad, Read This”